Can you trust everything you read about academic careers on social media?
If you spend time on social media and follow discussions around academia or graduate school, you might have come across a generally negative view regarding the pursuit of a traditional academic career after having obtained a PhD.
Ā
For example, I’ve noticed quite a few LinkedIn and Instagram posts from individuals who opted for non-academic paths after their PhDs. Frequently, they openly share their negative experiences in academia.
Ā
And it’s not just on social media: Iāve also spotted similar articles in Nature Career blog page. Here are few examples of articles that caught my eyes (click on the title to access them!):
š” Has the āgreat resignationā hit academia?
š” How five researchers fared after their āgreat resignationā from academia
š” Fed up and burnt out: āquiet quittingā hits academia
Ā
I often feel uncomfortable when reading these articles and posts.
Yes, an academic career is tough.
Yes, an academic career is now the exception rather than the rule.
Yes, many of you will thrive more outside of academia.
Ā
But.
Ā
But it’s important to remember that what holds true for one person may not apply to everyone. Just because someone had a difficult time in academia doesn’t mean everyone will share that experience. The way people navigate and experience their careers is influenced by a mix of their personality, skills, and environment.
Ā
It’s not all black and white: some might find academia unfulfilling, while others could see it as the perfect fit. You might struggle in one academic position but excel in another academic setting or institution.
Ā
In today’s message, I want to explore this by discussing five benefits and five challenges I’ve encountered in my academic career. I’ll be open about my own struggles and what I genuinely appreciate about academia.
Ā
Letās dive in!
ā Challenge #1 | Work-Life Balance
Managing a good work-life balance with a huge workload has been and remains my biggest challenge.
The academic workload often goes beyond the hours in our contracts. Itās almost normal to work more than what our contract says. When I say “more,” I mean 10, 20, or even 40 hours extra! This isnāt surprising, considering the expectations across research, teaching, management, service, communication, editorial roles, peer-reviewing, etc. It feels impossible to be great in all areas – and barely possible to do whatās expected in a normal working week.
Ā
Some people are okay with working nights and weekends. I sometimes (rarely, actually) work nights and weekends too, but I want it to be my choice – not because Iām forced to do it to manage all my tasks.
So, Iāve decided to stick to my contract hours as much as possible. It doesnāt mean Iām less ambitious: it means Iām in control of my decisions and how I want to live my life.
Ā
What’s hardest about making my well-being and work-life balance a priority? The worry I’ll disappoint people. Canāt keep up with emails? I worry about letting students down. Canāt take on more work? I worry about letting down my boss or colleagues.
Ā
(So basically, instead of working, I now worry during nights and weekends š )
Ā
Ā
ā Challenge #2 | Funding and Publishing Pressure
Being a researcher means you need to get funding for your research. The problem? Weāre all competing for the same money, against other talented researchers. Getting funding means writing lots of grant proposals, which means spending hundreds of hours on something with a small chance of getting funded. Often, these hours are in the evening and weekend, since other tasks still need to be done. No money means no research since we need PhD students and postdocs to move the research forward – and publish.
Ā
Research also means publishing. You know the saying – “publish or perish”. Itās still true. Researchers with more and better publications are looked at more favorably, also when applying for grants.
Ā
Both publishing and funding bring a lot of pressure and stress. It takes a lot of experience to get through the rejections – for papers and especially for grants – and use those experiences to do better.
Ā
Ā
ā Challenge #3 | Salary Considerations
Academia has clear salaries because positions are linked to specific scales, which usually means the same salary at different institutions within the country.
Ā
Another good thing is that a salary increase is guaranteed every year, along with other benefits (e.g., 40 days holidays, an 8% holiday allowance, and an 8.3% end-of-year bonus in the Netherlands).
Ā
But (thereās always a “but” in the challenges section!): salaries are usually lower than in the public sector. Also, special bonuses are almost non-existent. There’s no extra pay for working more or being excellent; extra hours are not paid. I found this hard to understand – especially at the start of my career, when I was working very hard but still struggling financially.
Ā
Ā
ā Challenge #4 | Competitive Landscape and Job Instability
Academia is all about competition: for funding, for positions, for being the first to publish in a field.
Competition can be exciting but also tiring. Itās tough to find a position in academia after a postdoc because of the huge competition.
Ā
Besides, job security is not guaranteed. As we mentioned in a previous newsletter, itās common now in many countries to have a Tenure track, which is a temporary position that becomes permanent only if you meet certain expectations. Considering that people on the Tenure track are usually at a stage where they want more stability in their lives, this can be very stressful.
Ā
ā Challenge #5 | Insufficient Administrative Support
The level of administrative support available often doesnāt meet the needs of academic staff, adding more challenges to our already demanding jobs.
Ā
This means we have to do many tasks ourselves. I remember talking with a colleague from industry, who was surprised when I told her what I do in my days. For example? It happened frequently that Iāve had to order food and drinks from the supermarket for coffee breaks during meetings or drinks after a symposium at my institute.
Luckily, despite these challenges, there are many aspects that make being in academia exciting and fun!
š„ Joy #1 | Enthusiasm and Dynamism
Working in academia surrounds you with young people – mostly PhD students, postdocs, and Bachelor/Master students. Their stays are often temporary, from a few months to a few years, ensuring a constant influx of motivated and enthusiastic individuals.
Ā
This not only brings a breath of fresh air to research but also makes our job a lot of fun.
Ā
The temporary nature of their positions means we’re constantly adapting to new people and ways of working. It can be tough to see people go after years, but itās exciting to welcome new faces. I enjoy being around different generations and learning from each other.
Ā
š„ Joy #2 | Impact on Society
Being in academia is about making a significant impact through our research and the students we mentor. Mentoring future scientists, who will change the world, is a major drive for me. Itās incredibly fulfilling when someone tells me theyāve understood something critical thanks to my help, or could move on with their career plans.
Ā
š„ Joy #3 | Continuous Learning
Since we often rely on ourselves for many tasks, it means thereās always something new to learn, and no chance to get bored. We also work with the latest tools and methods, being at the forefront of innovation, which is truly exciting.
Ā
š„ Joy #4 | Networking Opportunities
Academia is the place to play the networking game. There are so many options to network: conferences, symposia, or just through the students who join our network.
Ā
I refer to my network as āscientific friendsā because thatās how it feels. Meeting them at conferences, sharing a drink, and meeting new people is refreshing and leads to meaningful connections. These connections are not just professional; theyāre gateways to inspiration and future collaborations.
Ā
š„ Joy #5 | Personal and Professional Growth
Last but not least, climbing the academic ladder also means growing personally and professionally, and learning better about our talents ā with the possibility to explore them further.
Ā
Academia might be conservative, but Iāve seen positive developments recently. Individual talents start to be recognized and rewarded – without the need to be excellent and perfect in all aspects of their job. An example comes from the Netherlands, where key Dutch academic institutions published in 2019 a position paper called āRoom for everyoneās talent; towards a new balance in the recognition and rewards of academicsā (in Dutch), which outlines a vision to reform how academic achievements are evaluated in the Netherlands. It advocates for a more holistic approach that values a wide range of contributions beyond traditional publication metrics, including teaching and societal impact.
Ā
Iāve seen these changes at my university, which is implementing ways to recognize and reward the individual talents of academics in research, teaching, impact, or leadership.
Ā
Ten years back, if someone had told me I’d start my own company while pursuing an academic career, and both would thrive and be interconnected, I wouldn’t have believed it. This is just one example, but it demonstrates how the field is gradually changing. It’s evolving slowly, yet surely.
Ā
The take-home message?Ā
š” What holds true for one person may not apply to everyone. Always look at the two sides of the coins and take informed decisions about your career.Ā
š” Yes, academia can seem resistant to change and slower to adapt than society at large, but there are positive developments occurring.
Interested in receiving insights, tips and tools directly in your inbox? Sign up for the NextMinds Newsletter!